Skip to main content

Create an execution scope

K
Written by Kristian Luoma
Updated over a month ago

An execution scope is the unit of accountability in In Parallel. Every scope gets one living execution plan, one history of decisions, and one place to stay aligned over time.

If you get the scope right, everything feels calm and obvious. If you get it wrong, the system feels noisy.

In this article

  • What an execution scope is

  • How to choose the right scope

  • How to name it (so it sticks)

  • Common mistakes (and how to fix them)

  • Examples of good scopes


What is an execution scope?

A scope is a bounded area of responsibility—like a team, project, program, portfolio, account, or business area.

In Parallel is designed around a simple principle:

One scope → one living execution plan.

That’s how you avoid “one mega-plan for the whole company” and keep execution reality legible.


Choose the right scope

The fastest way to pick a scope

Start with the question:

“What outcomes am I accountable for executing?”

If the answer includes multiple unrelated cadences, owners, or success metrics, you’re probably looking at multiple scopes.

What makes a scope “good”

A good scope typically has:

  • clear ownership (one person accountable for outcomes)

  • a real cadence (recurring meeting or review rhythm)

  • meaningful decisions (tradeoffs, priority shifts, ownership decisions)

Scope types (and when to use them)

Execution scopes can be: team, project, program, portfolio, account, or business area.

Here’s how to think about them:

  • Team scope: when you’re managing a team’s ongoing execution (steady rhythm, stable membership)

  • Project scope: when there’s a clear start/end and a defined outcome

  • Program scope: when multiple projects roll up to a shared outcome with shared dependencies

  • Portfolio scope: when you need one view over multiple initiatives that share strategic oversight

  • Account scope: when external commitments and internal coordination need a single execution truth

  • Business area scope: when a function runs ongoing priorities (Ops, RevOps, Finance Ops, etc.)


Name your scope so it works in real life

Scope naming seems small, but it affects adoption: people need to recognize the scope instantly.

Good scope names

Good names:

  • match how people already talk about the work

  • imply execution responsibility (not aspiration)

  • are easy to say in meetings and updates

Examples:

  • “Platform Migration”

  • “Product Weekly”

  • “Q2 Growth Program”

  • “Revenue Operations”

  • “Customer X Delivery”

Names to avoid

Avoid names that are:

  • vague (“Everything”, “Company”, “Ops Stuff”)

  • overly strategic (“Transformation”, “Innovation”, “Future”)

  • disconnected from cadence (no one knows what meeting drives it)

Tip: If you can’t explain the scope in one sentence, it’s probably too broad.


Create the scope (recommended setup)

When you create a scope, you’re setting up the container the system will use to keep execution reality coherent.

Recommended steps

  1. Create the scope (choose the scope type and name).

  2. Add goals/commitments (1–3 to start).

  3. Attach the recurring meeting that drives decisions for this work.

  4. Add members and stakeholders (keep it small at first).

Once that’s in place, In Parallel can start doing the thing it’s built for:

  • capture signals from meetings

  • generate pre-reads and reports

  • update the living plan

  • create snapshots so change is explicit


Common mistakes (and how to fix them)

Mistake: Starting with “the whole company”

Symptoms:

  • the plan is huge

  • priorities can’t be ranked

  • updates feel noisy and contradictory

Fix:

  • shrink the scope until it has one clear owner and one cadence

  • create additional scopes later (once the first one works)

Mistake: Mixing unrelated cadences

Symptoms:

  • weekly ops + monthly leadership + ad-hoc project meetings all in one scope

  • snapshots feel chaotic

Fix:

  • split scopes by cadence (or at least by decision rhythm)

Mistake: Creating scopes that don’t have real decisions

Symptoms:

  • the plan doesn’t change meaningfully

  • the scope feels “stale”

Fix:

  • attach the actual decision-making meeting

  • or pick a scope where real tradeoffs happen


Examples of good scopes

Teams

  • “Platform Team”

  • “Revenue Operations”

Projects

  • “Billing Migration”

  • “Onboarding Redesign”

Programs / portfolios

  • “Q2 Growth Program”

  • “Enterprise Readiness Portfolio”

Accounts

  • “Customer X Delivery”

  • “Strategic Account: ACME”


Related articles

  • Connect a recurring meeting (meeting transcriber)

  • Define goals & commitments

  • Add members & stakeholders

  • Understand the living execution plan

  • What are snapshots?

Did this answer your question?